Adam Teer

9-10-’06

 

This trip was quite an experience.  The first section we navigated was the Ghost Section, which was not at all like I expected it to be.  I thought the river was going to look more like the disturbed headcut section, which we visited second. Before this trip, I had never been on an undisturbed river like we saw in the Ghost Section.  It was really remarkable to see an environment like that and the interaction between all of the species. In the Ghost Section, when we first went into an area with trees enclosing the river and blocking out the sunlight, I was truly amazed.

When I compared what I saw in the Ghost Section to what I saw in the headcut section, it did not even look like the same river. The Ghost Section was tranquil, beautiful, and undisturbed.  It was the river ecosystem in its pure state.  The Army Corps of Engineers channelized sections of the Wolf River.  Now certain sections are eating deeper down into the bottom of the river, causing its water level to drop.  Flooding can occur in the regions. [RC1] The headcutting caused the second section of the river to become a wasteland of dead trees that protruded from the shallow water. It changed from being enclosed and scenic to being wide open and decrepit.[RC2]   It was the dumping ground for sewage and a graveyard for garbage and dead trees.  One of the canoes in our group found an empty keg floating along the shore.  The head cut section was not secluded from human life like the Ghost Section.  It went right next to streets and by houses etc.  It was a completely different environment and did not look like what a river should look like.

The one thing I did enjoy about the headcut region was the diversity of birds we saw.  We saw a wood duck, a great blue heron, and a belted kingfisher all within twenty seconds.  We also heard a woodpecker.  In the Ghost section we only saw herons.

Originally I was not looking forward to canoeing. But what I learned and experienced on both trips really struck me.  It was an awesome experience, so much so that I volunteered to go back and help Dr. Kesler with further data gathering.  The only downsides to the canoeing trips were maneuvering through the mess of dead trees in the headcut section, and falling into the river while lifting our canoe over a log in the Ghost Section.  The water was really cold and seemed really grimy.  Sitting soaking wet in my canoe for the rest of the day was not a pleasant experience.  P.S. It took my pants 5 days to dry out fully.


 [RC1]What do you mean by this?  Do you mean flooding is less likely to occur here, or flooding is more likely to occur further downstream

 [RC2]Again, the use of this word is not clear.  Its usual meaning conveys “old age” “failing in function.”  Is this what you meant?